Staheli, Urs; PhD
UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX (UNITED KINGDOM), 1998
POLITICAL SCIENCE, PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (0617); PHILOSOPHY (0422)
This study reads Niklas Luhmann's systems theory from the perspective of deconstructive
discourse
theory (Derrida, Laclau). Focusing on how systems theory deals with failures
within the meaningful
reproduction of autopoietically closed social systems, the thesis examines strategies
of containment that
delimit the range of failures. The specific handling of what deconstruction
theorizes as the impossibility of
full meaning is discussed in respect to systems theory's conception of meaning.
The thesis traces
systems theory's exclusion of failure at different instances: the theorisation
of the environment of
systems, the exclusion of non-meaning, the separation of meaning from language,
the blind connectivity
of communication, and the repeatability of forms. However, it is also argued
that failures of signification
re-occur in concepts such as the blind spot and the unmarked state, the confusion
of signs, the
disturbance (Irritation) of systems, and rupture of meaning within communication
(Fuchs), as well as a
rhetorical grafting of identitary repetition. The analysis of semantics problematizes
its status and argues
that semantics provides the terrain for a politics of deparadoxization. Drawing
from Laclau's theory of
hegemony, this concept offers a supplement to systems theory in conceptualizing
the antangonistic
articulation of paradoxical undecidabilities. In contrast to the routines of
the political system, the politics of
deparadoxization is not linked to a particular system. Rather, it parasitically
inhibits systems by providing a
temporary overcoding that promises an imaginary identity, best exemplified by
the 'suction of integration'
which the form of antagonism generates.
Social
Systems Simulation Group
P.O. Box 6904 San Diego, CA 92166-0904 Roland Werner, Principal Phone/FAX (619) 660-1603 |