KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY, 1980
ECONOMICS, AGRICULTURAL (0503)
Policies for integrated rural development cannot be complementary unless the
community and it's policy
makers understand the interrelatedness of all the economic and social sectors.
Because of the
complexity involved with such a systems approach, planners and policy makers
can clearly benefit from
the information provided by mathematical models for integrated rural development
tailored to specific
areas. This paper develops and applies a linear programming simulation analysis
of agricultural and rural
development to the Northwestern Kansas counties of Decatur, Rawlins and Sheridan.
The overall
objective of this study is to: (1) construct a mathematical simulation for rural
economic development
based on; (2) data collected from local, state and federal sources to; (3) identify
and represent, from a
gaming standpoint, the rural economic relationships that exist within a small
three county area and; (4)
measure the relative sensitivity of the simulation model given these relationships
for changes in
population levels, agricultural prices and interest rates. Based on the demonstrated
similarities between
previous micro and macro growth models this study utilizes a macro growth model
concept, in the form of
an objective function maximizing net increments to capital stock, by incorporating
micro data at the firm
activity level to simulate integrated rural development. The results were compared
to those of a more
commonly used objective function maximizing area incomes. The mathematical model
consists of two
base (exporting) sectors: agriculture and industry, plus two non-base sectors:
commerce and local
government. Given the land, labor, capital, consumption and climatological limitations
existing in the area
the various sectors of the model are linked and interdependent with each other
through capital and labor
flows. Education, conservation and capital borrowing activities are used to
introduce resource flexibility in
the model within and between different time periods. Separate simulations were
conducted for both
objective functions incorporating changes in the labor force, agricultural price
levels and interest rates on
borrowed capital. Simulation results indicated that both objective functions
generated similar growth
patterns for integrated rural development in the three county area when cumulatively
measured over the
time periods of the model. However, simulation results for the capital stock
objective function favored
new industrial sector investment and growth over that of the agricultural sector
during the early time
periods as compared to the simulation results for the income objective function.
Simulation results for
both objective functions indicated that integrated rural development in the
three country area is most
responsive to changes in the interest rate on borrowed capital and agricultural
price levels.
Social
Systems Simulation Group
P.O. Box 6904 San Diego, CA 92166-0904 Roland Werner, Principal Phone/FAX (619) 660-1603 |