KIM, YONG-HAK; PHD
THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO, 1986
SOCIOLOGY, SOCIAL STRUCTURE AND DEVELOPMENT (0700)
By linking the structural constraints and the intentionality of corporate actors,
the study mathematically
formalizes the emergence of the network of political alliances of resource transactions
among interest
groups, social movement organizations and government organizations in the national
energy and health
policy domains. The mathematical models are based on the conception that the
system of relations and
the outcomes of collective decisions are mutually integrated in that (1) the
relations of resource
transactions among organizations arise because of their purposive action to
pursue preferred policy
options, and (2) the event outcome (or decision-making establishing state policies)
are the consequence
of the emerged relations. I revise and extend Coleman's mathematical model of
collective action and
apply the revised models to eight selected controversial events in each policy
domain. The dependency
model finds that a pair of health organizations is more likely to establish
a channel of resource
deployment if the model predicts the presence of the relation between the pair
and if members of the
pair have a common organizational type. Two models of organizational strategy,
i.e., the resource
deployment model and the resource mobilization model, predicted accurately both
the organizations'
control over events and the outcomes for every event. Business organizations
in energy and
professional societies in health are the most influential in influencing collective
decisions. The matching
of the interest to mobilize and the interest to deploy between a pair of organizations
accounts for the
greatest portion of the variance of observed resource transactions. Overall,
the estimated matrices of
effectiveness of government organizations support the idea that the resource
flow from interest groups
to government organizations is the function of the latter's control over a set
of events in which the former
are interested. The correct predictions of event outcomes suggest that the determinants
of policy
making reside in the structure of the private-public interpenetration and that
the pluralistic representation
of public interests by interest groups must be understood in the context of
the multi-organizational fields
of resource transactions and multiple events. This finding has important implications
for extending the
polity model of resource mobilization proposed by Charles Tilly.
Social
Systems Simulation Group
P.O. Box 6904 San Diego, CA 92166-0904 Roland Werner, Principal Phone/FAX (619) 660-1603 |