BIASIOLLI, FRANCIS CARROLL; PHD
UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA, 1980
SOCIOLOGY, DEMOGRAPHY (0938)
Variations in regional, national, and international distributions of wealth,
power, and income have
provided grist for sociological mills from the beginning of the discipline.
This dissertation belongs to that
stream of analysis formed by the confluence of general conflict theory and world
system analysis. These
two perspectives are brought together in a theoretical argument designed to
explain first, the distribution
of wealth across social systems which are economically integrated in an industrial
network, and secondly,
the distribution of income within the individual social systems themselves.
The theoretical argument
developed and tested in this dissertation contends that: (1) Any economically
integrated industrial
network can be divided into two basic regions or territories-- the Core (or
Center) and the Periphery. The
distinction between these two structural positions arises largely from the fact
that the Core region tends
to be more cohesive and in greater control of its internal development and growth
than does the
Periphery. Growth and development in the Periphery is frequently the result
of external forces and
influence. (2) Those factors which operate to determine structural location
within the network influence
not only internal relations within social systems, such as internal distributions
of power and resources, but
also external relations between social systems including, in particular, relations
of dependency. (3) The
two structural regions (Core and Periphery) can each be further divided into
core social systems and
peripheral areas. Here again the essential distinction is the degree of cohesion
and domestic control of
growth and development. (4) The set of all core social systems (regardless of
whether they lie in Core or
Periphery regions) can be arranged into a rough hierarchy based on relative
ability to influence the
network economy. (5) The relative wealth of any of the core social systems,
although the result of many
factors, is significantly affected by both position in the core hierarchy and
structural location in the
network. (6) Each of these three factors (wealth, position in the core hierarchy,
and structural location)
influences the internal distribution of power (both sociopolitical and socioeconomic)
within social
systems. (7) The distribution of income within each core system is largely a
reflection of the distributions
of sociopolitical and socioeconomic power found therein. This theoretical argument
was expressed
graphically in a path model which was then tested, using structural equation
techniques, on a
cross-sectional sample of one-hundred-and-fourteen SMSAs of the United States
whose 1970
population was in excess of 250,000. The testing of the model tended to provide
strong support for the
theoretical argument: over sixty percent of the variation in income concentration
within the SMSAs of the
sample, over fifty percent of the variation in power concentration within the
SMSAs of the sample, and
nearly fifty percent of the variation in wealth across the SMSAs of the sample
was 'explained' by the
model. In the course of the analysis two findings emerged suggesting some modification
of the model
and questions for further research. In the first place, although concentration
of power accounted for
close to sixty percent of the variation in income concentration, inclusion of
the other background
variables (structural location, position in the core hierarchy, and wealth)
increased the proportion of
explained variance by some ten to twenty percent. This finding suggests that
the impact of the
background variables on income concentration is not completely transmitted through
the intervening
concentration of power variables as initially predicted. Secondly, and of greater
interest, it appears that
the core (metropolitan) hierarchy is multidimensional with different dimensions
of dominance or influence
leading to different structural consequences within the network and within social
systems themselves.
The conclusion suggests that this multidimensional aspect of the stratification
of social systems may
roughly parallel the class, status, and power dimensions of the stratification
of individuals.
Social
Systems Simulation Group
P.O. Box 6904 San Diego, CA 92166-0904 Roland Werner, Principal Phone/FAX (619) 660-1603 |